Summarised by Centrist
A proposed law change allowing Police to charge for their presence at public events has critics warning it could suppress free speech and disadvantage grassroots organisers.
The National MP for Maungakiekie Greg Fleming recently defended the proposal on Newstalk ZB, claiming it would free Police from distractions. However, opponents argue it’s a “slippery slope” toward censorship.
“If enacted, it could mean groups like ours would have to pay for Police protection at events like our AGM,” said one organisation’s CEO after speaking with Fleming. This concern extends to groups hosting controversial events, like Speak Up For Women, who could face additional costs for police presence if counter-protests arise.
Critics contend such costs would unfairly burden not-for-profits and smaller organisations, discouraging them from hosting events altogether.
Opponents emphasise that Police are publicly funded to protect citizens and ensure public safety. “Our taxes already pay for this,” they argue, adding that event organisers shouldn’t be penalised because others might break the law. Some fear the change could be weaponised to target groups with unpopular or ‘provocative’ views, further stifling free speech.
The proposal has prompted calls for the Minister and Associate Minister of Police to reconsider. Advocates for free speech and democracy insist the move undermines open discourse and could lead to prejudicial policing.
