
‘Any attractive female’ was at risk: systemic failures exposed in Juliana Herrera murder case
“Any attractive female moving into the neighbouring flats or next door, it would be seen as a potential risk”
FACTS
The CENTRIST AI LINKS feed provides an AI curated list of the headlines that best fit the CENTRIST mission.
We don't necessarily agree with the articles in the list, but we think they're interesting.
The CENTRIST AI engine scores the articles across the following dimensions:
If an article meets the threshold on any one dimension, it's in the list.
The coloured bar represents the total percentage score of the dimensions that we measure.
It's not perfect, but we think its pretty good. We hope you find it useful and interesting.
“Any attractive female moving into the neighbouring flats or next door, it would be seen as a potential risk”
The project now requires about US$2 million to finish its work.
“The deed of acknowledgement is not co-governance.”
“All recruits should be good to go when released to district.”
“Are we really getting dumber, or is this a sign of a deeper shift in how we think and process information?”
“A Dutton coalition Government will not change the current policy.”
“The idea that state schools are neutral while Christian schools indoctrinate is a myth.”
A “natural experiment.”
“Any attractive female moving into the neighbouring flats or next door, it would be seen as a potential risk”
The project now requires about US$2 million to finish its work.
“The deed of acknowledgement is not co-governance.”
“All recruits should be good to go when released to district.”
“Are we really getting dumber, or is this a sign of a deeper shift in how we think and process information?”
“A Dutton coalition Government will not change the current policy.”
“Any attractive female moving into the neighbouring flats or next door, it would be seen as a potential risk”
The project now requires about US$2 million to finish its work.
“All recruits should be good to go when released to district.”
“The deed of acknowledgement is not co-governance.”
“Are we really getting dumber, or is this a sign of a deeper shift in how we think and process information?”
“A Dutton coalition Government will not change the current policy.”
The CENTRIST AI LINKS feed provides an AI curated list of the headlines that best fit the CENTRIST mission.
We don't necessarily agree with the articles in the list, but we think they're interesting.
The CENTRIST AI engine scores the articles across the following dimensions:
If an article meets the threshold on any one dimension, it's in the list.
The coloured bar represents the total percentage score of the dimensions that we measure.
It's not perfect, but we think its pretty good. We hope you find it useful and interesting.
Those in other countries, including New Zealand, who are disdainful of the Trumpian approach will do well to pay attention to what is happening in our own institutions.
Charlie Mitchell’s analysis is thoughtful in parts, but some conclusions need a second look.
Are parents being let off the hook?
By calling the keffiyeh a “terrorist tea towel,” Shane Jones brought culture war language into Parliament.
The same newsroom that gave Doyle the benefit of nuance turned around and gave Campbell the axe. Does this suggest that, at the Herald, politics decides the tone?
This is a callout to anyone who wants to talk to the Royal Commission but thinks they are constrained by confidentiality provisions or “professional ethics”.
Those in other countries, including New Zealand, who are disdainful of the Trumpian approach will do well to pay attention to what is happening in our own institutions.
Charlie Mitchell’s analysis is thoughtful in parts, but some conclusions need a second look.
Are parents being let off the hook?
By calling the keffiyeh a “terrorist tea towel,” Shane Jones brought culture war language into Parliament.
The same newsroom that gave Doyle the benefit of nuance turned around and gave Campbell the axe. Does this suggest that, at the Herald, politics decides the tone?
This is a callout to anyone who wants to talk to the Royal Commission but thinks they are constrained by confidentiality provisions or “professional ethics”.