Summarised by Centrist
The Australian government’s plan to ban under-16s from social media has reignited debates over the harm it causes.
Danielle Einstein of Macquarie University argues these discussions often distract from the core issue: reliable evidence already demonstrates that excessive social media use harms young people.
Social media fosters envy, comparisons, and FOMO (fear of missing out). These contribute to anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem in teens. Algorithms, influencers, extreme content, and cyberbullying makes the effects worse.
Studies show excessive social media use links to dissatisfaction with appearance and schoolwork in under-16s. Evidence also suggests limiting usage reduces anxiety and FOMO in young adults aged 17–25.
Einstein points to parallels with smartphone bans in schools. Critics initially argued bans would hinder children’s ability to cope online, yet he believes the opposite has proven true: reduced bullying, fewer mental health issues, and improved academic performance, especially among disadvantaged students. Similarly, limiting social media use could benefit young people’s development and school communities.
Einstein argues that a lack of access to comprehensive data from tech companies has hampered research but insists existing evidence is enough to justify strong regulation.
“Focusing on debates between researchers makes us complacent,” she warns. Instead of waiting for perfect data, Einstein argues for decisive action to mitigate the harm social media inflicts on young people.
