Court of Appeal slams SFO ‘unnecessary, unreasonable and oppressive’ methods

Summarised by Centrist

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) faces criticism from the Court of Appeal for its misuse of powers in fraud investigations. 

These findings caused the collapse of a high-profile fraud case against Māori trust chair Roger Pikia, which spanned nearly a decade. 

Judges found the SFO’s data collection methods—targeting individuals, businesses, and even political figures—unlawful, calling them “unnecessary, unreasonable and oppressive.” The concerns put the future of its prosecutions in doubt. 

The ruling exposed systemic overreach, with the court noting that the SFO collected more than a million documents, including irrelevant personal communications.

The SFO’s actions included demands for banking, travel, and phone records from Pikia, his partner, and unrelated individuals like Tainui leader Tukoroirangi Morgan. “This appears to have been a substantial and unjustified invasion of their privacy,” the judges stated. 

They criticised the SFO for using Section 9 notices of its 1990 Act to compel the surrender of electronic devices, which the court ruled was beyond its legal authority.

The judges also condemned the SFO’s broad search warrants, describing them as indiscriminate “fishing expeditions” aimed at uncovering any wrongdoing, regardless of its relevance to the investigation. “This is the antithesis of the correct approach,” the judgment read, adding that Parliament never intended for Section 9 to enable such practices.

Read more over at Newsroom

Enjoyed this story? Share it around.​

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Read More

NEWS STORIES

Sign up for our free newsletter

Receive curated lists of news links and easy-to-digest summaries from independent, alternative and mainstream media about issues affect New Zealanders.

GRAHAM ADAMS: Trans ‘No Debate’ policy collapses

If you want to attack anyone for what you and a few of your fellow ideological travellers see as doctrinal error, you really shouldn’t make your target the grieving parents of a child who died alone of starvation in a motel room.

GRAHAM ADAMS: Trans ‘No Debate’ policy collapses

If you want to attack anyone for what you and a few of your fellow ideological travellers see as doctrinal error, you really shouldn’t make your target the grieving parents of a child who died alone of starvation in a motel room.

1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x