Concerns over legislation rushed through Parliament under urgency

Summarised by Centrist

In his article, “Questions raised and thoughts aired about legislation rushed through parliament under urgency limiting scrutiny of it”, Eric Frykberg writes on the growing apprehension surrounding the expedited passage of laws in New Zealand’s Parliament without prior notice or debate. 

A number of academics and the New Zealand Law Society have expressed their concern over the  frequent use of “urgency” depriving Kiwis of essential in-depth scrutiny over legislation and increasing potential for technical errors in the final laws.

Urgency, which should ideally be reserved for genuine emergencies, is now often applied to laws that don’t meet this criterion, leading to a lack of expert input, public engagement, and understanding of the legislation. 

New Zealand’s parliament lacks an upper house, making the select committee process crucial for thorough examination. 

Opposition parties also argue that this practice often leads to sneaky policy changes, evading the balanced democratic scrutiny and legislative rules of normal procedure.

But what can be done? 


Read the full article over at Interest.co.nz

Enjoyed this story? Share it around.​

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Read More

NEWS STORIES

Sign up for our free newsletter

Receive curated lists of news links and easy-to-digest summaries from independent, alternative and mainstream media about issues affect New Zealanders.