NZ First moves to scrap diversity requirements in public service

Summarised by Centrist

Winston Peters is making another move against what he calls “woke left-wing social engineering,” introducing the Public Service (Repeal of Diversity and Inclusiveness Requirements) Amendment Bill. 

The bill removes diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) mandates from public service hiring, ensuring merit is the primary factor in government recruitment.

“The public service exists to serve New Zealanders—not to be a breeding ground for identity politics,” Peters said. He argues that hiring should be based on merit, not “forced woke” policies. 

The bill would repeal key sections of the Public Service Act 2020, including obligations for workforce diversity, government briefings on inclusiveness, and diversity considerations in appointing chief executives.

While this is not a government bill, and will only proceed if drawn from the ballot, it signals NZ First’s intent to dismantle the DEI framework it once supported when it was in coalition with Labour in 2020.

National’s Chris Bishop was non-committal, saying his party prioritises “meritocracy” but will review the bill if it advances. 

Read more over at Stuff and Chris Lynch Media

Subscribe to our free newsletter here

Enjoyed this story? Share it around.​

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
47 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Read More

NEWS STORIES

Sign up for our free newsletter

Receive curated lists of news links and easy-to-digest summaries from independent, alternative and mainstream media about issues affect New Zealanders.

GRAHAM ADAMS: Trans ‘No Debate’ policy collapses

If you want to attack anyone for what you and a few of your fellow ideological travellers see as doctrinal error, you really shouldn’t make your target the grieving parents of a child who died alone of starvation in a motel room.

GRAHAM ADAMS: Trans ‘No Debate’ policy collapses

If you want to attack anyone for what you and a few of your fellow ideological travellers see as doctrinal error, you really shouldn’t make your target the grieving parents of a child who died alone of starvation in a motel room.