NZ First says disruption may have been avoided ‘if Verrall had just answered the question’

Summarised by Centrist

Labour’s Ayesha Verrall has called for political unity against intimidation at campaign events after protesters confronted her. 

NZ First accused her of embracing the principle only when she became the target.

NZ First and ACT’s Wellington North candidates refused to sign Verrall’s open letter. NZ First called it “performative hypocritical nonsense”, pointing to previous attacks and disruptions involving Winston Peters, Posie Parker and NZ First meetings and asking where Verrall’s concern was then.

The letter followed a disorderly candidates’ meeting in Wadestown. John Ansell voiced allegations at Verrall over her time as health minister, police intervened and other candidates stood between Verrall and the protesters.

Verrall claimed the behaviour went beyond robust debate and endangered candidates, organisers and members of the public. Her letter asks organisers to moderate meetings and follow Parliamentary Service security guidance. Candidates from National, the Greens, the Opportunity Party and Alliance signed it.

NZ First cited protests outside Peters’ home, including an incident in which a crowbar was put through a window, the assault on Posie Parker and repeated disruption of NZ First meetings. Its spokesman ended with a pointed observation that the confrontation might have been avoided “if Verrall had just answered the question”.

ACT candidate Matthew Hague accepted that genuine security risks exist but said Verrall’s letter achieved little. He argued that organisers should work directly with police and security staff rather than give disruptive protesters more attention.

Read more at The NZ Herald

Receive our free newsletter here