Summarised by Centrist
The Epsom electorate, held by ACT Party leader David Seymour, is at risk as New Zealand’s Representation Commission considers cutting one seat from Auckland for the 2026 election.
Law professor Andrew Geddis explained that, with central Auckland’s growing population demands, “Epsom… could be split into nearby electorates” to balance numbers.
Recent census data led Stats NZ to drop the total electorates to 64, which may dissolve Epsom to meet legal requirements for population size in electorates.
The decision could impact ACT’s stronghold, which has been central to its parliamentary representation since 2005, though ACT recently achieved enough votes to surpass the 5% threshold without needing Epsom.
Seymour voiced concern over potential bias, likening the possible redistribution to “American-style gerrymandering.” He argues that “communities of interest” should be preserved, emphasising Epsom’s shared values in aspiration and education.
He questioned the commission’s neutrality, noting that the 2020 review panel included former MPs from Labour and National. “Decision-makers are effectively appointed by Labour and National,” he said, claiming this could work against ACT’s interests.
However, Geddis argues that the commission is bound by the Electoral Act to avoid political motives, stating that it’s a purely numbers-based task.
Editor’s note: While decision-makers often claim neutrality, the reality of their impartiality often depends on who’s involved. Convincing those affected can be a challenge in itself, regardless of where the truth lies.ns may be.
Read more over at StuffImage: By Ingolfson – Self-photographed
