Anthony Willy’s take on censorship

Summarised by Centrist 

When it comes to censorship, Anthony Willy writes:

“What is surprising is that our democratic system of government backed by a Bill of Rights which guarantees our right to freedom of speech and thought supported by two hundred years of rational thought is itself under attack.”

Willy notes the stark contrast between overt censorship in authoritarian regimes like Communist China, where criticism can lead to severe repercussions, and the softer,  subtler forms seen in Western democracies.

Global warming and issues regarding gender are topics subject to censorship in the West, according to Willy. 

In terms of domestic issues, Willy says National’s seeming intention to thwart ACT’s attempts to hold a popularly supported referendum on the Treaty of Waitangi’s so-called “principles” amounts to a form of censorship. 

“If the Prime Minister persists in the [former National MP Chris] Finlayson view that the public cannot be trusted with a vote on a referendum on this matter, there may well be stormy times ahead for the coalition if there is an overwhelmingly favourable response to the proposal at the select committee hearings. In that event National will lay itself open to the charge of censoring public debate and denying free speech,” he writes. 

Read more over at NZCPR

Enjoyed this story? Share it around.​

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Read More

NEWS STORIES

Sign up for our free newsletter

Receive curated lists of news links and easy-to-digest summaries from independent, alternative and mainstream media about issues affect New Zealanders.

GRAHAM ADAMS: Trans ‘No Debate’ policy collapses

If you want to attack anyone for what you and a few of your fellow ideological travellers see as doctrinal error, you really shouldn’t make your target the grieving parents of a child who died alone of starvation in a motel room.

GRAHAM ADAMS: Trans ‘No Debate’ policy collapses

If you want to attack anyone for what you and a few of your fellow ideological travellers see as doctrinal error, you really shouldn’t make your target the grieving parents of a child who died alone of starvation in a motel room.