Summarised by Centrist
Despite public backlash, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has doubled down on its net-zero carbon goals, stating that emissions restrictions must exceed the scope of pandemic-era shutdowns to prevent warming beyond 1.5°C.
At the height of the pandemic, global emissions dropped by 5.4%, spurring climate activists to push for “climate lockdowns” to address global warming.
Proposals included bans on private vehicles, restrictions on red meat consumption, massive carbon taxes, and stringent energy-saving mandates.
Critics warn that such measures could result in energy shortages, food insecurity, and potentially widespread economic collapse.
Sceptics challenge the scientific basis of the climate cliff theory—They argue historical data shows no clear causation between carbon emissions and the idea that exceeding 1.5°C of warming triggers catastrophic environmental consequences.
Zerohedge’s Tyler Durden (a pseudonym) writes, “Temperature records for hundreds of millions of years prove that warming periods are a mainstay of the Earth’s climate history. In comparison, our current era is one of the coldest, not the warmest.”
The IMF insists its measures are vital to avoid environmental disaster. However, Durden claims the climate agenda serves as a means of redistributing wealth from developed to developing nations, and consolidating control over individual freedoms and property under global institutions like the IMF.
Image: Facebook
